引用本文:李秋萍1 何其迅2 何曦3 吴萍4 吴均2.医学院校博士招生申请审核制选拔指南的研究———以首都医科大学为例[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2019,18(12):1189-
医学院校博士招生申请审核制选拔指南的研究———以首都医科大学为例
Research on the doctoral application review system of medical university — based on Capital Medical University
DOI:
中文关键词:  医学博士  博士招生  申请审核制  选拔指南
英文关键词:Doctor of medicine  Doctoral candidate recruitment  Doctoral application review system  Selection guidelines
基金项目:
作者单位
李秋萍1 何其迅2 何曦3 吴萍4 吴均2 1首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院/国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心 1000502首都医科大学研究生院 1000693首都医科大学医学人文学院 1000694首都医科大学教务处 100069 
摘要点击次数: 2732
全文下载次数: 626
中文摘要:
      本研究基于问卷调查、个人深入访谈获取的数据,初步拟制《首都医科大学博士招生申请审核制选拔指南(初稿)》。然后,通过德尔菲法及卡方检验,制定《首都医科大学博士招生申请审核制选拔指南》。该指南包含科学素养、学术能力、科研能力和人格品质4个一级指标,27个二级指标。调研对象普遍认为,素养、能力、品德是博士选拔指南的核心内容;导师对申请者素质、能力要求高的同时,同样重视申请者的人格品质。此外,导师对专业学位博士生的科研能力同样有较高要求。
英文摘要:
      Based on the data obtained from the questionnaire survey and personal in-depth interviews, this study preliminarily formulated the "selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University" (draft). In addition, through Delphi method and chi-square test, the author formulated the "selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University". The guide contained four primary indicators of scientific literacy, academic ability, scientific research ability and personality quality and 27 secondary indicators. The respondents generally believed that quality, ability and moral character were the core contents of the doctoral selection guide. The doctoral advisors attached great importance to the personality quality of the applicants while having high requirements on the quality and ability. Meanwhile, the doctoral advisors also had high requirements on the scientific research ability of doctoral students in professional degrees.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码