引用本文:杨顺月1 晏姗2 于建云3 许传志1 宋国凤1 陆发倩1 李富丽1 邵维堂1 游顶云4.西部某医科大学本科授课教师课堂教学质量及影响因素分析[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2019,18(12):1244-
西部某医科大学本科授课教师课堂教学质量及影响因素分析
Analysis of teaching quality and influencing factors of undergraduate teachers in a Medical University in western China
DOI:
中文关键词:  课堂教学质量  影响因素  Logistic回归分析
英文关键词:Teaching quality  Influencing factors  Logistic regression analysis
基金项目:
作者单位
杨顺月1 晏姗2 于建云3 许传志1 宋国凤1 陆发倩1 李富丽1 邵维堂1 游顶云4 1昆明医科大学公共卫生学院 6505002昆明医科大学分子临床医学研究院 650500 3昆明医科大学高等教育研究所 650500 4昆明医科大学科技处 650500 
摘要点击次数: 2295
全文下载次数: 517
中文摘要:
      目的 了解云南某医科院校课堂教学质量现状及其影响因素,探讨课堂教学质量提升策略。方法 采用自制的授课教师课堂教学质量学生评价表(含9个一级指标),在2016年12月对2013级至2016级部分学生开展调查,评价对象为2016年9至12月给学生授课的教师,涉及全校7个不同专业、23位教师、18门课程。用SPSS 21.0进行数据分析,计数资料用频数和百分比描述,对满意度进行单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析。结果 本次调查回收有效问卷1 542份。单因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,6个因素与授课教师课堂教学质量总体满意度有关,分别为“是否为专业课程(OR=1.430)”“课程难度(OR=1.731)”“课程进度(OR=1.620)”“课后投入时间(OR=1.141)”“学习前的感兴趣程度(OR=1.565)”“学习后的感兴趣程度(OR=2.291)”。结论 “属于专业课程”“课程难度较低”“课程进度慢”可能是教学满意度高的有利因素;而“课程为学生所在院系开设”“课后投入时间短”“学习后感兴趣程度低”可能是教学满意度高的不利因素。
英文摘要:
      Objective In order to understand the current situation and influencing factors of teaching quality in a Medical University in Yunnan, thus improving the teaching quality of the teachers. Methods The self-made evaluation forms for teachers' teaching quality which include 9 first-level indicators were adopted. In December 2016, a survey was conducted on some students from grade 2013 to 2016 about the teachers who gave them lectures from September to December 2016, involving 7 different majors, 23 teachers and 18 courses. SPSS 21.0 was used for data analysis. Enumeration data were described by frequencies and percentages. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used for satisfaction. Results There were 1 542 valid questionnaires collected in this survey. Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that there were 6 factors related to the overall satisfaction of teachers' classroom teaching quality, which were "whether the courses are professional (OR=1.430)", "curriculum difficulty (OR=1.731)", "curriculum progression (OR=1.620)", "learning time after class (OR=1.141)", "interest before class (OR=1.565)", and "interest after class (OR=2.291)", respectively. Conclusion "courses are professional", "courses are too easy", and "the progression of courses is slow " are favorable factors for high satisfaction degree, while "courses are set up by the departments that the students belong", "learning time used after class is too short", and "interest for study is decreased after class" may be unfavorable factors for high satisfaction degree.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码