| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1619 |
| 全文下载次数: 657 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 探讨运用“快闪”培训与传统集中授课两种方法，对提高非内分泌科护士胰岛素理论知识及辨识能力的应用效果。方法 以分层抽样的方法抽取德阳市人民医院非内分泌病区443名护士，分为实验组227人与对照组216人；培训前均进行胰岛素知识问卷调查，实验组以“快闪”的形式进行培训，对照组按照传统集中授课的方法进行培训；培训后对比两组理论及操作成绩，分析常见问题错误率及培训满意度。采用SPSS 22.0进行卡方检验和t 检验。结果 实验组胰岛素辨识知识问卷得分、胰岛素辨识操作得分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；实验组在胰岛素分类、起效时间、进餐时间方面存在的问题少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；实验组培训后满意度高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 非内分泌科护士对胰岛素理论知识及辨识能力较为欠缺，采用“快闪”培训可提高非内分泌科护士胰岛素理论知识及辨识能力，减少关键环节错误的产生，提高培训满意度，保证胰岛素治疗的有效性和安全性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the effect of "flash" traingingand traditional training on improving the insulin theoretical knowledge and identification ability of nurses in non-endocrinology department. Methods We selected 443 nurses from the non-endocrine ward of our hospital by stratified sampling, and divided them into the experimental group (227 cases) and the control group (216 cases). Before the training, questionnaires on insulin knowledge were conducted. The experimental group was trained in the form of "flash", and the control group was trained with traditional training. After the training, the theoretical and operational results of the two groups were compared to analyze the error rate of common problems and training satisfaction. Chi-square test and t test were carried out by SPSS 22.0. Results The scores of questionnaire about insulin identification knowledge and operation in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, (P<0.01). The experimental group have significantly better control in insulin classification and insulin onset time than the control group (P<0.01). The satisfaction of nurse was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion Non-endocrinology nurses are lack of theoretical knowledge and recognition ability of insulin. The "flash" training can improve their training satisfaction, and ensure the effectiveness and safety of insulin treatment. |
|
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
