引用本文:伍艳1 肖羽1 何文博2 王星月1.医学研究生就业质量评价指标体系的构建[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2022,(3):257~261
医学研究生就业质量评价指标体系的构建
Construction of evaluation index system for employment quality for medical graduates
DOI:
中文关键词:  医学研究生  就业质量  评价指标体系
英文关键词:Medical graduate  Employment quality  Evaluation index system
基金项目:
作者单位
伍艳1 肖羽1 何文博2 王星月1 1四川大学华西临床医学院研究生部成都 6100412四川大学华西临床医学院医院管理研究所成都 610041 
摘要点击次数: 304
全文下载次数: 184
中文摘要:
      目的 构建高校医学研究生就业质量评价指标体系。方法 通过文献回顾和专家咨询,初步拟定评价指标。选择9名专家采用德尔菲法进行3轮函询,并确定一、二、三级指标及权重。采用Excel 2016和SPSS 22.0对数据进行录入和分析。结果 咨询问卷的有效回收率为100.0%,专家平均权威系数为0.749(>0.700),专家协调系数分别为0.228和0.212(P<0.001)。最终构建了由5个一级指标、31个二级指标和66个三级指标及其权重构成的高校医学研究生就业质量评价指标体系。其中,各项一级指标的权重分别为0.283、0.250、0.200、0.108和0.158。结论 本研究构建的医学研究生就业质量评价指标体系具有较好的系统性、全面性和多维性,可为将来医学研究生就业质量评价提供参考,并有待于在实证中进一步探索其科学性和实用性。
英文摘要:
      Objective To establish an index system for evaluating the employment quality of medical students in universities. Methods Literature review and expert consultation methods were used to formulate preliminary evaluation indicators. Nine experts were selected to conduct three rounds of correspondence through Delphi method, and the indicators and the weights of the first, second and third levels were determined. Excel 2016 and SPSS 22.0 were used to make data entry and analysis. Results The effective recovery rate of the questionnaire was 100.0%, the average expert authority coefficient was 0.749(>0.700), and the expert coordination coefficients were 0.228 and 0.212 (P<0.001). Finally, an evaluation index system for the employment quality of medical students in universities was constructed, which was composed of 5 first-level indicators, 31 second-level indicators and 66 third-level indicators. Among them, the weights of the first-level indicators were 0.283, 0.250, 0.200, 0.108 and 0.158, respectively. Conclusion The employment quality evaluation index system for medical students constructed in this study is systematic, comprehensive and multi-dimensional, which can provide a reference for the evaluation on medical graduate employment quality, and its scientificity and practicability need to be further explored in empirical research.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码
引用本文:
DOI:
中文关键词:  
英文关键词:
基金项目:
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      
英文摘要:
      
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码