| 基金项目:2018年度广东省高等教育教学改革项目(2018GJ03) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1454 |
| 全文下载次数: 476 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 了解某医科高校大学生对公共选修课（以下简称"公选课"）的重视程度、满意度及其影响因素，为学校公选课教学改革提供参考。方法 本研究采取定量问卷调查方式，随机抽取南方医科大学2018级在校大学生进行问卷调查。共计发放691份问卷，收回有效问卷674份。使用SPSS 20.0对数据进行描述性分析、单因素方差分析、多元线性回归分析。结果 学生的选课目的、对教师的评价、对课程的评价以及课程收获等与学生对公选课的重视程度和满意度得分差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。在选课目的中，因提高综合素质选课的学生对公选课重视程度（4.30±0.73）分和满意度（4.34±0.69）分高于其他选项；在教师评价中，对教师教学评价良好的学生对公选课的重视程度（4.32±0.71）分和满意度（4.45±0.62）分高于其他选项；在课程评价中，对课程评价优良的学生的重视程度（4.35±0.71）分和满意度（4.47±0.63）分最高；在课程收获中，学生对课程收获较多的公选课的重视程度（4.75±0.53）分和满意度（4.85±0.36）分最高。对不同特征对象公选课满意度进行多元线性回归分析，发现性别、教学形式、教师评价、课程质量及课程收获5个变量对公选课满意度得分差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 男性、探究式教学形式、对教师评价越高、对课程质量评价越高、课程收获越多，具有这些特征的学生公选课满意度较高。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To investigate the importance, satisfaction and influencing factors of college students in a medical university, and to provide reference for the teaching reform of public elective courses. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted in this study among Batch 2018 students of Southern Medical University. A total of 691 questionnaires were distributed and 674 valid ones were recovered. The data were analyzed descriptively, and one-way ANOVA analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were carried out by using SPSS 20.0. Results There were statistical differences between students' objective of elective course, evaluation of teachers, evaluation of courses and harvest of courses and students' satisfaction and attention to public elective courses (P<0.05). Students who chose courses for improving their comprehensive quality paid more attention to public courses [(4.3±0.73) points] and had higher satisfaction [(4.34±0.69) points] than other options. Students with good evaluation on teachers' teaching paid more attention to public elective courses [(4.32±0.71) points] and their satisfaction [(4.45±0.62) points] was higher than other options. Students with good evaluation on the courses had the highest degree of attention [(4.35±0.71) points] and satisfaction [(4.47±0.63) points]. Students paid the highest attention [(4.75±0.53)points] to and had the highest satisfaction [(4.85±0.36) points] with the public elective courses with more course harvest. The multiple linear regression analysis found that the 5 variables, gender, teaching forms, teaching evaluation, course quality and course harvest had significant differences in the scores of public elective course satisfaction (P<0.05). Conclusion The male students, in inquiry teaching form, the higher evaluation on the teacher, the higher the course quality, and the more the course harvest, the higher the students' satisfaction with the public elective courses. |
|
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
