引用本文:陈春宇 朱亚鑫 胡冰雪 曲波.国内外执业医师资格考试通过标准的设定方法研究[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2015,14(3):217~220
国内外执业医师资格考试通过标准的设定方法研究
A research on the methods of establishing both domestic and foreign standards of physician qualification examination
DOI:
中文关键词:  执业医师资格考试  合格分数线  Angoff法  Nedelsky法  Borderline Group法
英文关键词:Examination of doctors' qualifications  Cutoff score  Angoff method  Nedel-sky method  Borderline group method
基金项目:
作者单位
陈春宇 朱亚鑫 胡冰雪 曲波 The Research Center for Medical Education of China Medical University, Shenyang 110013, China 
摘要点击次数: 457
全文下载次数: 255
中文摘要:
      自实施执业医师资格考试以来,其通过标准的设定方法一直备受争议。本研究介绍Angoff法、Modified Angoff法、Nedelsky法、Borderline Group法四种当今国内外比较常用的方法,概述其优缺点及其在各国执业医师资格考试通过标准设定过程中的使用情况,以期为中国的执业医师资格考试合格分数线的设定提供借鉴和参考。
英文摘要:
      Since the examination of doctor's qualifications came into effect, methods that are set by standard to judge whether one passes the examination or not were in dispute all the while. This article is going to introduce four kinds of methods(Angoff method、Modified Angoff method、Nedelsky method、Borderline group method) which are commonly used at home and abroad. Summarizing their advantages, disadvantages and the usage in the process of standards setting in various countries, we aim to provide reference for setting cutoff score of the examination of doctor's qualifications in China.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码