引用本文:贾金忠,石培瑶,蒋薇,李京芮,张梦婷,王志强,朱睿,朱泉熔,刘梦荃,徐明.中国医学应届毕业研究生教育满意度评价报告(2023年)[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2024,23(2):145-150
中国医学应届毕业研究生教育满意度评价报告(2023年)
2023 Report on satisfaction with graduate education of recent medical graduates in China
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231108-01640
中文关键词:  医学  应届毕业研究生  教育  满意度
英文关键词:Medicine  Fresh graduate  Education  Satisfaction
基金项目:中国研究生院院长联席会研究生教育研究重大课题(ACGS03-2021003);国家社科基金教育学重点项目“新时代研究生教育高质量发展研究”(AIA210012)
作者单位邮编
贾金忠 北京大学研究生院医学部分院学会秘书处办公室北京 100191
北京大学医学学位与研究生教育研究中心北京 100191 
100191
石培瑶 石河子大学医学院预防医学系石河子 832003 832003
蒋薇 石河子大学医学院预防医学系石河子 832003 832003
李京芮 石河子大学医学院预防医学系石河子 832003 832003
张梦婷 石河子大学医学院预防医学系石河子 832003 832003
王志强 石河子大学医学院预防医学系石河子 832003 832003
朱睿 石河子大学医学院预防医学系石河子 832003 832003
朱泉熔 北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系北京 100191 100191
刘梦荃 北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系北京 100191 100191
徐明* 北京大学研究生院医学部分院北京 100191 100191
摘要点击次数: 5768
全文下载次数: 154
中文摘要:
      目的 了解我国医学应届毕业研究生教育满意度现状,分析不同人群间的差异,提出对策建议。方法 2023年6至7月采用自编问卷,对78所院校的16 903名医学应届毕业研究生的课程环节、实践环节、科研训练、导师指导和院校管理满意度进行调查。使用SPSS 26.0进行t检验和方差分析比较不同人群间教育满意度的差异情况。结果 医学应届毕业研究生导师指导、课程环节、实践环节、院校管理和科研训练满意度评分依次为4.44、4.03、4.02、3.90和3.82;男生、博士、非调剂生、综合性大学、非农业户口、家庭人均年收入为中高、父母文化程度高、父母为中高层职业的研究生各维度满意度评分更高(P<0.05)。结论 医学研究生教育满意度有进一步提升空间,应关注重点人群,从教育政策、学校管理、导师指导等方面,因人施策、因材施教,不断提升医学研究生教育质量。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the current situation of satisfaction with graduate education among recent medical graduates in China, and analyze the differences between different populations, and to propose countermeasures and suggestions.Methods From June to July 2023, a self-made questionnaire was used to survey 16 903 medical graduates who had recently earned a post-graduate degree from 78 institutions about their satisfaction with curriculum sessions, practical sessions, research training, tutoring, and institutional management. The degrees of satisfaction with education among different populations were compared through the t test and analysis of variance with the use of SPSS 26.0.Results The scores of satisfaction of the graduates with tutoring, curriculum sessions, practical sessions, institutional management, and research training were 4.44, 4.03, 4.02, 3.90, and 3.82, respectively. Satisfaction scores for individual dimensions were significantly higher for males, doctors, non-transfers, comprehensive universities, non-agricultural household registration, moderate-to-high annual household income per capita, parents with high educational levels, and parents with mid- or senior-level occupations (P<0.05).Conclusions There is room for improvement in students' satisfaction with medical graduate education. To improve the quality of medical graduate education, attention should be paid to key populations, education policies, school management, and tutoring to provide appropriate education for different students.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码